Constitutional court dismisses complaint regarding the validity of a 1932 administrative act under the 1920 Constitution.

The Constitutional Court dismissed the applicant's complaint challenging the legality of a specific administrative decision rendered in 1932. The applicant argued that the act violated fundamental rights protected by the 1920 Constitution, while the state contended the measure was necessary for public order. The court rejected the claim, finding no sufficient evidence of a constitutional violation in the specific circumstances presented.