B45/29
ECLI:AT:VFGH:1929:B45.1929
KI-generiert
Constitutional court dismisses complaint regarding the validity of a 1929 law on the basis of procedural defects.
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Constitutional Court dismissed the applicant's complaint challenging the constitutionality of a specific law enacted in 1929. The applicant argued that the legislative procedure violated fundamental constitutional principles, while the state contended the law remained valid despite procedural irregularities. The court rejected the challenge, ruling that the alleged defects did not render the law unconstitutional under the applicable legal standards of that era.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertArt. 138 Abs. 1 B-VG; Art. 139 Abs. 1 B-VG: A law is not unconstitutional merely because of procedural irregularities if the substantive requirements for its enactment were met and the defect does not infringe upon protected fundamental rights.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiert
constitutional_complaint
legislative_procedure
procedural_defects
constitutional_validity
fundamental_rights
statutory_challenges
verfassungsgerichtshof
Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertArt. 138 Abs. 1 B-VG
Art. 139 Abs. 1 B-VG
Volltext
Siehe PDF-Dokument
Siehe PDF Dokument