Constitutional court dismisses complaint regarding the validity of a 1929 administrative act under the 1920 Constitution.
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Constitutional Court dismissed the applicant's complaint challenging the legality of a specific administrative decision rendered in 1929. The applicant argued that the act violated fundamental rights protected by the 1920 Constitution, while the state contended the measure was necessary for public order. The court rejected the claim, ruling that the challenged act did not infringe upon the constitutionally guaranteed rights at the time.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertArt. 13, Art. 14, Art. 15 of the 1920 Constitution: The Constitutional Court lacks jurisdiction to review the substantive legality of administrative acts from the 1920s unless they directly violate constitutional rights, and such acts are presumed valid absent clear evidence of infringement.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVolltext
Siehe PDF-Dokument
Siehe PDF Dokument