Constitutional court dismisses complaint regarding the validity of a 1929 administrative decision on state compensation.

The Constitutional Court dismissed the applicant's complaint challenging the legality of a 1929 administrative decision concerning state compensation. The applicant argued that the decision violated constitutional principles regarding property rights and state liability, while the state maintained the decision was lawful under the regulations in force at the time. The court rejected the challenge, ruling that the administrative act did not contravene the constitution as interpreted in 1929.