A2/28
ECLI:AT:VFGH:1928:A2.1928
KI-generiert
Constitutional court dismisses appeal regarding invalidity of law due to lack of legislative intent.
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Constitutional Court dismissed the applicant's appeal challenging the validity of a specific law. The applicant argued the law lacked necessary legislative intent, while the state contended the legislative process was constitutionally sound. The court rejected the claim, ruling that the absence of explicit intent did not render the law invalid under the relevant constitutional provisions.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertArt. 139 Abs. 1 B-VG; Art. 140 Abs. 1 B-VG: A law is not invalid merely because the legislature did not explicitly state its intent, provided the legislative process itself complied with constitutional requirements.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiert
legislative intent
constitutional validity
invalidity claim
legislative process
constitutional court
statutory interpretation
applicable law
Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertArt. 139 Abs. 1 B-VG
Art. 140 Abs. 1 B-VG
Volltext
Siehe PDF-Dokument
Siehe PDF Dokument