Constitutional court dismissed challenge to 1926 law regarding state liability for war damages without compensation.

The Constitutional Court dismissed the applicant's complaint challenging the constitutionality of a 1926 law exempting the state from liability for war damages. The applicant argued that the law violated fundamental rights by preventing compensation for injuries sustained during the war. The court upheld the law, reasoning that the state's obligation to compensate for war damages was not absolute and could be limited by legislative discretion in times of national crisis.