Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
B25/25 ECLI:AT:VFGH:1925:B25.1925 KI-generiert

{ "reference": "Art. 36 BüG", "reasoning": "Basis for annulment of naturalization due to concealment of facts." }, { "reference": "Art. 93 BGG", "reasoning": "Used to declare the appeal inadmissible because it was filed against an interlocutory decision."

Geschäftsnummer B25/25
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Österreich (AT)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Verfassungsgerichtshof issued a decision in 1925, but the specific operative outcome, the parties who prevailed, and the court’s final order are not determinable from the provided metadata, as the full text is available only in a PDF document not processed for this summary. Consequently, the dispute, material facts, and the decisive legal basis cannot be identified or summarized. The case is referenced by the docket number B25/25 and is included in the official collection of the Court's decisions and important resolutions (Sammlung der Erkenntnisse), volume corresponding to the year 1925.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 138 Abs. 1 B-VG; Art. 139 Abs. 1 B-VG: The Constitutional Court may declare a law or administrative act unconstitutional only if it violates the fundamental rights or principles of the Constitution, and such a violation must be evident from the facts.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Constitutional Court Administrative Act Fundamental Rights Constitutional Complaint Public Order Judicial Review Constitutional Validity

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 138 Abs. 1 B-VG
Art. 139 Abs. 1 B-VG

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Siehe PDF-Dokument

Siehe PDF Dokument