Constitutional court dismisses complaint regarding the validity of a specific administrative act under the 1922 Constitution.

The Constitutional Court dismissed the applicant's complaint challenging the constitutionality of a specific administrative decision. The applicant argued that the act violated fundamental rights protected by the 1922 Constitution, while the state contended the measure was lawful and necessary. The court rejected the claim because the challenged act did not infringe upon any constitutionally guaranteed rights or exceed the legislative authority of the state.