Constitutional court dismisses appeal rejection claim, ruling violation of rights excluded by rejecting appeal instead of returning case.

The Constitutional Court dismissed the applicant's claim that their constitutionally guaranteed rights were violated by the rejection of their appeal. The applicant argued that the lower court should have returned the case for reconsideration rather than simply rejecting the appeal. The court held that such a procedural rejection inherently excludes the possibility of a constitutional violation claim under the relevant legal framework.