Constitutional jurisdiction over administrative acts: Exclusion of measures corresponding to judicial orders under Article 144 B-VG
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Constitutional Court dismissed the constitutional complaint, upholding the lower instance's position that the challenged measure did not qualify for judicial review under the constitutional provision. The dispute concerned whether a specific administrative action, implemented in accordance with a judicial order, constituted an administrative act subject to constitutional jurisdiction. The Court held that any official action corresponding to a judicial order is never to be qualified as an administrative act for purposes of Article 144 of the Federal Constitutional Law, and this exclusion applies even if the underlying judicial order was issued orally or by telephone. Consequently, the challenged measure was deemed outside the scope of the Court's competence.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertArt. 144 B-VG; A judicial order, whether oral or written, is never to be qualified as an administrative act under Art. 144 B-VG.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertZitierte Rechtsprechung
KI-generiertVolltext
9616
Art144 B-VG; eine gerichtlichen Anordnungen entsprechende Amtshandlung ist niemals als Verwaltungsakt iS des Art144 B-VG zu qualifizieren (VfSlg. 6815/1972, 7203/1973) und zwar auch dann nicht, wenn die Anordnung des Richters bloß mündlich (fernmündlich) getroffen wurde (VfGH 3. 3. 1982, B156, 157/81)