Standing of public land community for constitutional complaint lacking due to specific committee resolution requirement

The Constitutional Court ruled that the complaint was inadmissible for lack of standing, effectively dismissing the challenge and leaving the lower administrative authority's decision in force. The dispute concerned a public land community (*Agrargemeinschaft*) that sought to file a constitutional complaint against an administrative court decision; however, while the community's committee had resolved to file a complaint with the Administrative Court, it had not specifically resolved to file a complaint with the Constitutional Court. The decisive legal basis was the doctrine of standing for legal entities in constitutional proceedings, which requires an explicit internal resolution authorizing the specific legal action; by analogy to previous jurisprudence concerning municipalities, the absence of a specific committee resolution for the Constitutional Court complaint meant the entity was not legally empowered to proceed.