Constitutional court holds administrative coercion includes both the order and its concrete execution method.

The Constitutional Court ruled that administrative coercion under Article 144 of the Federal Constitutional Law encompasses not only the existence of an order but also its specific manner of execution. The petitioner argued that the detailed implementation of administrative measures constituted a direct exercise of coercive power requiring judicial review. The court affirmed that the 'how' of administrative action is integral to the definition of coercion, thereby expanding the scope of judicial oversight over administrative acts.