Inadmissibility of VfGH complaints challenging acts of jurisdiction and medical expert opinions

The Constitutional Court dismissed the constitutional complaint, ruling that the complainant had no standing to challenge the contested matter. The dispute centered on an attempt to review acts of jurisdiction and medical expert opinions, which the court determined fell outside the scope of judicial review. The decisive legal basis was Article 144 of the Federal Constitutional Law, which explicitly denies the Constitutional Court the authority to review acts of jurisdiction; furthermore, the court held that medical opinions are neither administrative decisions nor exercises of direct administrative coercive power, thereby precluding any admissible constitutional complaint against them.