Constitutional complaint inadmissibility due to failure to individually articulate concerns regarding legal conformity

The Constitutional Court dismissed the constitutional complaint as inadmissible, upholding the validity of the contested provision because the applicant failed to meet strict procedural requirements for a direct petition. The dispute concerned a challenge to the legality of a specific provision under Article 139 of the Federal Constitutional Law, where the applicant sought the annulment of the legal act but did not individually articulate the concerns regarding its conflict with the constitution. Relying on § 57(1), second sentence of the Constitutional Court Act, the Court held that the absence of a detailed presentation of these specific illegality concerns constitutes a procedural impediment (Prozeßhindernis) rather than a curable formal defect, thereby rendering the complaint non-justiciable and preventing the Court from examining the merits.