Constitutional court dismisses procedural aid request due to formal defects in the complaint. The applicant failed to correct formal errors, leading to rejection of the aid application. The court ruled that uncorrected formal deficiencies preclude the review of the underlying complaint.

The Constitutional Court rejected the application for procedural aid, citing formal defects in the complaint. The applicant failed to address specific formal requirements, and the opposing party argued these defects rendered the complaint inadmissible. Consequently, the court dismissed the request, holding that uncorrected formal errors prevent the court from examining the merits of the underlying complaint.