Supervisory authority's notice of inaction lacks Bescheid character and is not subject to constitutional review under Art 144(1) B-VG

The Constitutional Court dismissed the constitutional complaint, holding that the challenged communication did not constitute an administrative act and therefore was not justiciable. The dispute centered on a notice from the Federal Ministry of Finance, acting as the insurance supervisory authority, stating that it found no grounds to initiate supervisory measures; the applicant challenged this notice under Article 144(1) of the Federal Constitutional Law. Relying on consistent case law, the Court determined that a mere informational communication regarding the absence of an intent to act lacks the decisive legal effect and binding character of an administrative decision (Bescheid), and thus falls outside the jurisdiction of the Constitutional Court.