Constitutional court lacks jurisdiction over a non-binding administrative statement regarding child custody. The court ruled it is not a binding decision or administrative order.

The Constitutional Court dismissed the complaint, ruling it lacked jurisdiction over the contested administrative communication. The applicant challenged a letter from the district juvenile office regarding his son's custody, which the court characterized merely as a non-binding opinion without normative force. Consequently, the court determined that such a statement does not constitute a binding decision or an act of administrative coercion, thereby excluding its own authority to review the matter.