Constitutional admissibility threshold for procedural errors: insufficiency of interrogation and legal warnings fails to reach Verfassungssphäre under § 2 Abs 1 B-VG

The Constitutional Court dismissed the complaint as inadmissible, upholding the prior administrative decision. The dispute concerned a challenge to an administrative penalty or order, where the complainant alleged procedural defects including insufficient interrogation and inadequate legal warnings by the authorities. The Court held that these allegations did not constitute a grave violation of procedural law reaching into the constitutional sphere defined by Article 2(1) of the Federal Constitutional Law, thereby failing to meet the threshold for judicial review.