Constitutional complaint inadmissible for lacking coherent facts and specific request: substantive defect not curable under § 18 VerfGG

The Austrian Constitutional Court dismissed the constitutional complaint as inadmissible, finding no viable claim for the complainant. The dispute centered on a submission that failed to present a coherent statement of facts and lacked both a specific request and any application falling within the Court’s jurisdiction. The Court held that the absence of these essential elements constitutes a substantive defect in the complaint rather than a mere procedural irregularity, making it ineligible for cure under Section 18 of the 1953 Constitutional Court Act, and cited established case law to this effect.