Constitutional complaint: No cost allocation upon rejection of treatment under established Constitutional Court jurisprudence

The Constitutional Court rejected the constitutional complaint and ordered no allocation of costs, as the dismissal of a complaint renders a cost award inappropriate under established case law. The dispute concerned the procedural handling of a constitutional complaint, specifically addressing the financial consequences of its rejection. The decisive legal basis is the consistent jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court, which holds that costs are not awarded in instances where a complaint is rejected from being treated on the merits.