Constitutional complaint dismissed due to lack of authorization from court-appointed guardian

The Constitutional Court dismissed the constitutional complaint for lack of standing. The complainant, represented by a court-appointed legal guardian, had filed a petition through a non-attorney draft seeking the annulment of an administrative decision issued by a regional government authority in October 1997. The decisive legal basis for the dismissal was the guardian's explicit notification to the court that they did not approve the filing, rendering the complaint inadmissible under the doctrine of mandatory representation and specific standing requirements under the Constitutional Act, which allowed for a non-public decision without further oral proceedings.